Once another bus finally pulled up, a #20, I hopped on it, and it took me back to central Gwangju, and through some areas I actually recognized. Recognized areas are boring. I know the #98 bus can take me to these places because I've passed them before. I ended up riding until I saw a stop for Sangmu Subway Station. Oh! The Subway! I haven't ridden that yet! I hop off at the Sangmu Subway Station stop and take a couple pictures that were halfway interesting, but honestly, at this point I'm out past the airport and the only things I see are an outlet mall and apartments.
Quick point: all the apartments in Gwangju look the same. No, seriously. There's about three different designs for apartments. I'm pretty sure this means that there's three companies building them and they just use the same design over and over because it's cheaper. Wouldn't you?
Anyway, so I'm in this terribly dull area of Gwangju. There's nearly nothing to photograph. I walk around a few blocks and everything is less than ten years old. I'm bored. Okay, maybe newer buildings are interesting to you, but they aren't to me. I hate new buildings. I'm so, so bored by most modern architecture.
Quick side note. We just finished the winter semester at the academy where I teach, and the last unit in one of the books I teach is about architecture. Specifically, it's about modern architecture. So, the first class I teach this unit to, I don't really explain architecture. Rookie mistake. I don't show them what I mean when I say "Modern Architecture." And the essays I get back from the kids are along the lines of "I like modern architecture because it has modern conveniences, like elevators." Oh, you lazy shits. "I like modern architecture because it lasts longer because it isn't built of dirt and grass." Wait, seriously? You want to compare modern architecture to buildings made 1,000 years ago? (Little did I know, traditional Korean architecture is insulated with dirt... more on that in another post.) "Modern architecture is better than older architecture because it is more colorful." Wait. Wait, wait, wait. Have you NOT been out to the places I have? Have you not seen the wonderful, beautiful colors painted on the undersides of the traditional roofs at temples? Their idea of colorful is colorful windows, or a building painted entirely pink.
So, for the other class using the same book I begin to describe architecture in more detail. I draw examples of older architecture and modern architecture on the board. I open the window of the classroom and I say, "What do you see? What is out there?" I explain how nothing in modern architecture is superfluous. There are no additions to the buildings that are unnecessary. The area around the structures is designed to make people want to live there. The playgrounds and parks are designed to entice parents. The exercise machines are designed to entice older couples. Everything is there for a reason! And this time, despite the fact that these students are at a lower lever than the other class, I still got better essays out of them. "I think modern architecture is simple in design." Yes. "I think modern architecture has useful features, like air conditioning." Oh, god, yes. I even got one student who wrote "I think modern architecture has very useful features like air conditioning, but I would still like to try to live in [traditional] Korean-style housing." I got through to him. He understood what I was trying to teach, and I got through to him. Sometimes I love my job.
That wasn't very quick, was it? Anyway, end tangent, back to the main story!